Association and interplay of surgeon and hospital volume with mortality after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the modern era

Gaurav Sharma, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Brigham and Women's Heart and Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Arin L. Madenci, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Brigham and Women's Heart and Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Mass.
Kerollos Nashat Wanis, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Mass.
Leah A. Comment, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Mass.
Christine E. Lotto, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Brigham and Women's Heart and Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Samir K. Shah, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Brigham and Women's Heart and Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Mass.
C Keith Ozaki, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Brigham and Women's Heart and Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
S V. Subramanian, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Mass.
Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen, Division of Vascular Surgery, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Me.
Michael Belkin, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Brigham and Women's Heart and Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. Electronic address: mbelkin@partners.org.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Operative volume has been used as a marker of quality. Research from previous decades has suggested minimum open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair volume requirements for surgeons of 9 to 13 open AAA repairs annually and for hospitals of 18 open AAA repairs annually to purportedly achieve acceptable results. Given concerns regarding the decreased frequency of open repairs in the endovascular era, we examined the association of surgeon and hospital volume with the 30- and 90-day mortality in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registry. METHODS: Patients who had undergone elective open AAA repair from 2013 to 2018 were identified in the VQI registry. We performed a cross-sectional evaluation of the association between the average hospital and surgeon volume and 30-day postoperative mortality using a hierarchical Bayesian model. Cross-level interactions were permitted, and random surgeon- and hospital-level intercepts were used to account for clustering. The mortality results were adjusted by standardizing to the observed distribution of relevant covariates in the overall cohort. The outcomes were compared to the Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines recommended criteria of <5% perioperative mortality. RESULTS: A total of 3078 patients had undergone elective open AAA repair by 520 surgeons at 128 hospitals. The 30- and 90-day risks of postoperative mortality were 4.1% (n = 126) and 5.4% (n = 166), respectively. The mean surgeon volume and hospital volume both correlated inversely with the 30-day mortality. Averaged across all patients and hospitals, we found a 96% probability that surgeons who performed an average of four or more repairs per year achieved <5% 30-day mortality. Substantial interplay was present between surgeon volume and hospital volume. For example, at lower volume hospitals performing an average of five repairs annually, <5% 30-day mortality would be expected 69% of the time for surgeons performing an average of three operations annually. In contrast, at higher volume hospitals performing an average of 40 repairs annually, a <5% 30-day mortality would be expected 96% of the time for surgeons performing an average of three operations annually. As hospital volume increased, a diminishing difference occurred in 30-day mortality between lower and higher volume surgeons. Likewise, as surgeon volume increased, a diminishing difference was found in 30-day mortality between the lower and higher volume hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons and hospitals in the VQI registry achieved mortality outcomes of <5% (Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines), with an average surgeon volume that was substantially lower compared with previous reports. Furthermore, when considering the development of minimal surgeon volume guidelines, it is important to contextualize the outcomes within the hospital volumes.