Pain expectancy, prevalence, severity, and patterns following donor nephrectomy: Findings from the KDOC Study
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
9-2020
Institution/Department
Nephrology & Transplantation
Journal Title
American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
MeSH Headings
Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kidney Transplantation (adverse effects); Living Donors; Nephrectomy (adverse effects); Pain, Postoperative (epidemiology, etiology); Prevalence
Abstract
Postoperative pain is an outcome of importance to potential living kidney donors (LKDs). We prospectively characterized the prevalence, severity, and patterns of acute or chronic postoperative pain in 193 LKDs at six transplant programs. Three pain measurements were obtained from donors on postoperative Day (POD) 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 41, 49, and 56. The median pain rating total was highest on POD1 and declined from each assessment to the next until reaching a median pain-free score of 0 on POD49. In generalized linear mixed-model analysis, the mean pain score decreased at each pain assessment compared to the POD3 assessment. Pre-donation history of mood disorder (adjusted ratio of means [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.40 [0.99, 1.98]), reporting "severe" on any POD1 pain descriptors (adjusted ratio of means [95% CI]: 1.47 [1.12, 1.93]) and open nephrectomy (adjusted ratio of means [95% CI]: 2.61 [1.03, 6.62]) were associated with higher pain scores across time. Of the 179 LKDs who completed the final pain assessment, 74 (41%) met criteria for chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP), that is, any donation-related pain on POD56. Study findings have potential implications for LKD education, surgical consent, postdonation care, and outcome measurements.
First Page
2522
Last Page
2529
Recommended Citation
Fleishman A, Khwaja K, Schold JD, et al. Pain expectancy, prevalence, severity, and patterns following donor nephrectomy: Findings from the KDOC Study. Am J Transplant. 2020;20(9):2522-2529. doi:10.1111/ajt.15861