Critical Care Management of Patients After Cardiac Arrest: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association and Neurocritical Care Society

Authors

Karen G. Hirsch, Stanford -University, Stanford, USA.
Benjamin S. Abella, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Edilberto Amorim, San Francisco-Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Mary Kay Bader, Providence Mission Hospital Nursing Center of Excellence/Critical Care Services, Mission Viejo, USA.
Jeffrey F. Barletta, Midwestern -University, Downers Grove, USA.
Katherine Berg, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA.
Clifton W. Callaway, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Hans Friberg, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Emily J. Gilmore, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

12-1-2023

Journal Title

Neurocritical care

Abstract

The critical care management of patients after cardiac arrest is burdened by a lack of high-quality clinical studies and the resultant lack of high-certainty evidence. This results in limited practice guideline recommendations, which may lead to uncertainty and variability in management. Critical care management is crucial in patients after cardiac arrest and affects outcome. Although guidelines address some relevant topics (including temperature control and neurological prognostication of comatose survivors, 2 topics for which there are more robust clinical studies), many important subject areas have limited or nonexistent clinical studies, leading to the absence of guidelines or low-certainty evidence. The American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and the Neurocritical Care Society collaborated to address this gap by organizing an expert consensus panel and conference. Twenty-four experienced practitioners (including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and a respiratory therapist) from multiple medical specialties, levels, institutions, and countries made up the panel. Topics were identified and prioritized by the panel and arranged by organ system to facilitate discussion, debate, and consensus building. Statements related to postarrest management were generated, and 80% agreement was required to approve a statement. Voting was anonymous and web based. Topics addressed include neurological, cardiac, pulmonary, hematological, infectious, gastrointestinal, endocrine, and general critical care management. Areas of uncertainty, areas for which no consensus was reached, and future research directions are also included. Until high-quality studies that inform practice guidelines in these areas are available, the expert panel consensus statements that are provided can advise clinicians on the critical care management of patients after cardiac arrest.

Recommended Citation

Hirsch, Karen G.; Abella, Benjamin S.; Amorim, Edilberto; Bader, Mary Kay; Barletta, Jeffrey F.; Berg, Katherine; Callaway, Clifton W.; Friberg, Hans; and Gilmore, Emily J., "Critical Care Management of Patients After Cardiac Arrest: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association and Neurocritical Care Society" (2023). MaineHealth Maine Medical Center. 3441.
https://knowledgeconnection.mainehealth.org/mmc/3441