Midterm Survival, Clinical, and Hemodynamic Outcomes of a Novel Mechanical Mitral Valve Prosthesis

Marc Ruel, Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Electronic address: mruel@ottawaheart.ca.
Michael W. Chu, Division of Cardiac Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Allen Graeve, Cardiothoracic Division, MultiCare Health System, Tacoma, Washington.
Marc W. Gerdisch, Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Franciscan St. Francis Health, Indianapolis, IN.
Ralph J. Damiano, Department of Surgery, Washington University SL, St. Louis, MO.
Robert L. Smith, Robotic Cardiac Surgery, The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano, Plano, TX.
William Brent Keeling, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, GA.
Michael A. Wait, Department of Cardiovascular & Thoracic Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Robert C. Hagberg, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT.
Reed D. Quinn, Department of Cardiac Services, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME.
Gulshan K. Sethi, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson Heart Center, Tucson, AZ.
Rosario Floridia, Department of Cardiovascular & Thoracic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA.
Christopher J. Barreiro, Sentara Health Research Center, Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk, VA.
Andrew L. Pruitt, Cardiovascular & Thoracic Surgery, St. Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI.
Kevin D. Accola, Cardiovascular Surgery, Florida Hospital, Orlando, FL.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the midterm survival, clinical, and hemodynamic outcomes of the On-X mechanical mitral valve, based on the 5-year results of the Prospective Randomized On-X Anticoagulation Clinical Trial (PROACT). METHODS: PROACT Mitral was a multicenter study evaluating 401 patients who underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR) with either Standard or Conform-X On-X mitral valves, comparing low-dose and standard-dose warfarin. Here, we report pre-specified, secondary outcomes of survival, New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification, and valve hemodynamics as assessed by core-lab-adjudicated echocardiography at 1, 3, and 5 years within the pooled population. RESULTS: Actuarial survival was 99.7%, 95.1%, and 92.4% at 1, 3, and 5 years, with no significant difference between Standard and Conform-X cuffs. Hemodynamic analysis revealed mean transvalvular gradients of 4.6 ± 2.0 mmHg at 1 year with no interaction between valve size and patient body surface area (BSA). MGs were consistent over time. Quality of life improved with 96.6% of patients in NYHA class I or II at the latest available follow-up of 3 or 5 years. There were no significant differences in survival, clinical, or hemodynamic outcomes between valve sizes. CONCLUSIONS: The On-X mechanical mitral valve demonstrated favorable survival, stable hemodynamics, and enhanced quality of life up to five years post-implantation. Derived from high-quality, rigorous randomized trial data, these findings can guide decision-making in young patients requiring MVR.