Vertical sleeve gastrectomy and semaglutide have distinct effects on skeletal health and heart function in obese male mice.

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

4-1-2025

Institution/Department

Center for Molecular Medicine

Journal Title

American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism

MeSH Headings

Animals, Male, Mice, Obesity, Gastrectomy, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Energy Metabolism, Bone Density, Heart, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Weight Loss, Bone and Bones, Mice, Obese, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1, Semaglutide

Abstract

Obesity is a global health challenge associated with significant metabolic and cardiovascular risks. Bariatric surgery and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are effective interventions for weight loss and metabolic improvement, yet their comparative effects on systemic metabolism-particularly energy metabolism, bone health, and heart function-remain unclear. In this study, obese male mice underwent vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG), 6 wk of GLP-1RA (semaglutide) treatment, or sham procedure with saline injection as controls. Dynamic changes in body weight, food intake, fat mass, lean mass, and bone mineral density were monitored. Energy metabolism was assessed using indirect calorimetry. Bone parameters and heart function were evaluated by microcomputed tomography or echocardiography, respectively. Compared with obese controls, VSG and semaglutide treatment comparably reduced body weight and improved glucose metabolism. However, VSG decreased energy expenditure, whereas both treatments similarly promoted lipid utilization. Semaglutide treatment increased ambulatory activity during nighttime. VSG led to significant bone loss, although 6 wk of semaglutide treatment had no significant effects on the skeleton. Cardiovascular outcomes also differed: VSG increased stroke volume without altering heart mass, whereas semaglutide reduced heart mass and transiently elevated heart rate. These findings underscore the importance of carefully weighing the benefits and potential risks of different weight loss treatments when addressing obesity and its systemic complications.

ISSN

1522-1555

First Page

555

Last Page

555

Share

COinS