Prospective Comparison of Short vs Long Chest Tube Water Seal Trial for Traumatic Pneumothorax

Authors

• Tara E. van Veen, From the Department of Surgery, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA (van Veen, Leichtle, Shafique, Varga).
• Christopher P. Michetti, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Capital Region Medical Center, Largo, MD (Michetti).
• Stefan W. Leichtle, From the Department of Surgery, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA (van Veen, Leichtle, Shafique, Varga).
• Saima Shafique, From the Department of Surgery, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA (van Veen, Leichtle, Shafique, Varga).
• Stephen E. Varga, From the Department of Surgery, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA (van Veen, Leichtle, Shafique, Varga).
• Daniel Cullinane, MaineHealth, Portland, ME (Cullinane).Follow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

5-1-2026

Institution/Department

Surgery

Journal Title

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

MeSH Headings

Humans; Pneumothorax (etiology, surgery, diagnostic imaging); Chest Tubes; Male; Adult; Female; Prospective Studies; Thoracostomy (methods, instrumentation); Middle Aged; Thoracic Injuries (complications, surgery); Length of Stay (statistics & numerical data); Time Factors; Trauma Centers; Device Removal (methods); Treatment Outcome; Water; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tube thoracostomy is a frequent intervention for trauma patients, yet there is insufficient evidence to guide management after placement. This study compared a short (6 ± 2 hours) vs a long (24 ± 2 hours) water seal trial (WST) before chest tube (CT) removal in patients with traumatic pneumothorax. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective (July 2020 to December 2022), multicenter review involving 25 trauma centers was conducted. Patients aged 18 years or older with traumatic pneumothorax undergoing WST were included. The primary outcome was successful CT removal after WST without the need for reinsertion. Secondary outcomes were reinsertion and duration of CT, number of chest radiographs (CXRs) after CT removal, and hospital length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Of the 1,394 included patients, 328 (27.4%) underwent short WST and 1,012 (72.6%) long WST. CTs were successfully removed among 280 (73.3%) in short and 694 (68.6%) in long WST (p = 0.250). Patients undergoing short WSTs had fewer CT reinsertions (n = 24 [6.3%] vs n = 98 [9.7%], p = 0.01), lower CT duration (3 [2 to 5] vs 4 [3 to 7] days, p <  0.001), fewer CXRs (2 [1 to 3] vs 2 [1 to 5], p < 0.001), and shorter LOS (7 [4 to 15] vs 9 [5 to 17] days, p <  0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter study demonstrated no significant difference between short and long WST duration with regard to successful CT removal. Short WSTs were associated with fewer adverse events, fewer CXRs, shorter CT duration, and shorter LOS.

First Page

1383

Last Page

1388

Recommended Citation

van Veen, Tara E.; Michetti, Christopher P.; Leichtle, Stefan W.; Shafique, Saima; Varga, Stephen E.; and Cullinane, Daniel, "Prospective Comparison of Short vs Long Chest Tube Water Seal Trial for Traumatic Pneumothorax" (2026). MaineHealth Maine Medical Center. 4473.
https://knowledgeconnection.mainehealth.org/mmc/4473