Conflicting health information: a critical research need.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
12-1-2016
Institution/Department
Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation; Maine Medical Center Research Institute
Journal Title
Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy
MeSH Headings
Conflict (Psychology), Consumer Health Information, Decision Making, Health Literacy, Humans, Mass Media
Abstract
Conflicting health information is increasing in amount and visibility, as evidenced most recently by the controversy surrounding the risks and benefits of childhood vaccinations. The mechanisms through which conflicting information affects individuals are poorly understood; thus, we are unprepared to help people process conflicting information when making important health decisions. In this viewpoint article, we describe this problem, summarize insights from the existing literature on the prevalence and effects of conflicting health information, and identify important knowledge gaps. We propose a working definition of conflicting health information and describe a conceptual typology to guide future research in this area. The typology classifies conflicting information according to four fundamental dimensions: the substantive issue under conflict, the number of conflicting sources (multiplicity), the degree of evidence heterogeneity and the degree of temporal inconsistency.
ISSN
1369-7625
First Page
1173
Last Page
1182
Recommended Citation
Carpenter, Delesha M; Geryk, Lorie L; Chen, Annie T; Nagler, Rebekah H; Dieckmann, Nathan F; and Han, Paul K J, "Conflicting health information: a critical research need." (2016). MaineHealth Maine Medical Center. 810.
https://knowledgeconnection.mainehealth.org/mmc/810